People usually tend to view the nation’s prime politicians in an unfavorable gentle than a positive one, in response to a ballot launched Tuesday.
Within the Gallup ballot, respondents have been requested about their view of 14 well-known political figures from the White Home to Congress to President Trump’s picks for his Cupboard and administration.
The survey-takers have been largely cut up on their assist for Trump, with 48 % having a positive opinion of the president. Roughly 50 % held the alternative view, the ballot reveals. One other 2 % didn’t have an opinion on the commander-in-chief.
Trump, Vice President Vance, Home Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), Senate Majority Chief John Thune (R-S.D.), Tulsi Gabbard — the president’s decide to steer nationwide intelligence — and tech billionaire Elon Musk all acquired related rankings, per the survey.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Home Minority Chief Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s nominee to move the Division of Well being and Human Providers (HHS). every garnered extra favorable rankings, about 7 or 8 % larger, than unfavorable ones, within the newest ballot.
At the least 1 in 4 adults within the U.S. stated they didn’t know Jeffries or Rubio effectively sufficient to have a positive opinion. Virtually half stated the identical about Thune and Gabbard, the info reveals.
Amongst these featured within the survey, Trump holds the best favorability score at 48 %. His 50 % unfavorable score can also be one of many highest, falling slightly below Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), 56 %, and former Vice President Kamala Harris’s 53 %.
Kennedy introduced within the second highest favorability score within the survey, with 46 %. Musk trails barely with 43 % favorability, adopted by Vance and Harris, who’re tied with 42 %.
Among the many listed figures, the ballot reveals that Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth, Gabbard and Thune are comparatively unknown, whereas Trump, Harris, Pelosi and Musk are far more widely known.
The Gallup survey was performed Jan. 21-27 amongst 1,001 respondents. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 share factors.
